Lovefield
The short film love field follows a linear narrative and
the director uses this to his advantage, I believe the director was
going along the theme of misconception and has used thriller/horror
convention throughout his narrative to achieve this. The film begins
with a shot of an empty field with long hay/barley in it, a creepy
non-diegetic soundtrack begins to play as the title sequence appears
on the screen letter by letter but very slowly, this points the
audience in to thinking this is going to be a horror/thriller film,
however no other information has been revealed yet. Going by todorovs
theory this would be classed as the equilibrium everything is as it
should be however the eary non-diegetic music puts doubt in the
audiences mind. After a few jump cuts changing the angle of the
camera in the field the pans stops on a old squeaky sign post
swinging in the wind, a raven is seen above the sign, this whole
scene has connotations that something bad is going to happen, the
squeaky sign post is a sound commonly heard in horror films when
suspense is being built. And Ravens have connotations of death. The
raven is seen on and off in the next few shots but the pace of
editing is slowed right down, making the audience believe the raven
has big involvement in the narrative or is pointing towards
something.
In the next few scenes shots of the field are seen, a
pan down the hay reveals the diegetic sound of a phone beeping as if
a call has been ended or denied, this builds a sense of enigma for
the audience as questions are started to be asked why is the phone in
this field and why is it ringing? This combined with the earlier
imagery and sound makes the audience think the worst. As the camera
pans round more loose money the phone and a bloody pair of women’s
underwear all point the audience into thinking the narrative is
taking a morbid turn. A man is the revealed a farmer with a skull
tattoo goes over to his truck and pulls out a red blanket, still the
narrative is pointing towards this being a horror as the non-diegetic
soundtrack is beginning to reach its climax, only once the man
reaches out with the blanket and picks up a baby is it revealed that
the non-diegetic music was contrapuntal and its aim was
misconception, to really impact the ending and make it hit a lot
harder that movie producers can use these conventions to guide
audiences into thinking the narrative is going one way and at the
last minute can change this. The shot reverse shot of the raven and
the man as the music nearly reaches its climax is as very powerful
shot as they are both in silence with their mouths open, a very nice
graphic matches, this is when the suspense is at its highest right
before the baby and mother are revealed, all enigma I answered once
the diegetic sound of a baby crying is introduced.
Good ED. This is good analysis but you were supposed to concentrate on narrative and therefore use narrative theory.
ReplyDeleteLevel 3